Family Told To Change Son’s Name or Ask Disney’s Permission To Go on Vacation

A recent incident involving seven-year-old Loki Skywalker Mowbray has ignited discussions around copyright law. The Home Office in the United Kingdom denied his passport application due to concerns over his middle name, “Skywalker.”

The name is notably associated with the iconic Star Wars franchise, which Disney owns. The family was given the option to either change Loki’s name or seek permission from Disney for its use.

Christian Mowbray, Loki’s father and a soldier in the Corps of Royal Engineers, expressed surprise over the refusal. Initially, the Home Office’s stance caused the family significant stress, particularly as they were preparing for a long-awaited vacation in the Dominican Republic.

Related: Disney & YouTube Aren’t Allowing Legal ‘Steamboat Willie’ Use

“Christian and his wife Becky, a former serving soldier, booked a holiday to the Dominican Republic at the end of October, the family’s first since 2014 due to their demanding work schedules and Becky’s struggles with Complex PTSD,” Suffolk News stated.

The incident reflects a growing concern regarding the implications of copyright law as it relates to personal names. This is not the first time that a passport based on a name’s association with intellectual property has been refused.

In a notable instance, a girl named Khaleesi also faced a similar situation when her passport application was previously denied due to Warner Bros. holding a copyright on that name, which is linked to Emilia Clarke’s character from Game of Thrones.

Such denials raise questions about how legal frameworks apply to names, which are a fundamental aspect of identity. The evolution of modern names, particularly those influenced by popular culture, suggests a need for legal re-examination.

The nature of naming is changing, with parents increasingly opting for names inspired by films and literature.
Consequently, authorities should consider these shifts while ensuring that copyright laws protect creators without infringing on individual rights.

The Mowbray family’s ordeal quickly gained traction across social media platforms, eliciting various responses from the public. Many users expressed support for the family, arguing that names inspired by popular culture should be permissible. Comments highlighted a growing resentment towards the rigid application of copyright laws as they intersect with personal identity.

Media coverage has also been extensive, with numerous outlets, including LBC and the Daily Mail, providing detailed narratives about the case. Coverage has largely focused on the implications of the Home Office’s actions, framing it as a clash between intellectual property rights and personal freedom.

“We were not aware that this could be a potential issue,” Christian Mowbray told Suffolk News. “We understand that Loki’s middle name is copyrighted, but we have no intention of using it for personal gain.

“I understand their [the Home Office] position and reasoning, but I believe they need to recognize that modern names are evolving,” the father of three continued. “I can understand if an adult changes their name for a ‘stunt,’ but this is not the case for a child from birth.”

The Skywalker name choice came about because Loki was born on May 4, AKA May the Fourth, which is typically known as Star Wars Day due to its play on the iconic “May the Force be with you” saying from the Lucasfilm franchise.

Related: Disney Confirmed To Lose Rights to 18 Films in Six Months

Public commentary often revolves around whether individuals should face limitations when naming their children, especially when these names derive from beloved cultural phenomena such as Star Wars or Marvel Studios.

The Home Office ultimately conceded and confirmed that Loki Skywalker Mowbray would be issued a passport. This decision alleviated the potential for canceled vacation plans and allowed the family to proceed with their holiday preparations. However, the case raises important questions about the future of naming conventions and the role of copyright law.

The Mowbray incident could serve as a catalyst for discussions about revisiting existing policies on name-related denials. It underscores a need to balance copyright holders’ interests, like Disney, with individual naming rights. As popular culture continues to shape naming trends, legislative adjustments may be necessary to ensure that citizens are not unduly restricted in expressing personal or familial identity.

This situation reminds us that while copyright law is essential in protecting creative assets, there must also be space for personal names to evolve in a society increasingly influenced by popular culture, from Star Wars to Marvel and beyond.

The Mowbrays can now enjoy the countdown to their Dominican Republic vacation.

What do you think about this family’s issues when trying to secure a vacation? Let us know in the comments down below!